B. SUGUNA W/O B. SUDARSHAN vs SMT. BOLLA MALATHI AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

WP-5756-2024 (J) C.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Digitally signed CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION by HUSENBASHA HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN RAHAMAN NADAF NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 5756 OF 2024 Date: 2025.02.11 17:01:14 +0530 B. Suguna ) W/o B. Sudarshan ) Age: 78 years ) R/A: H. No. 12-11-475, ) Pochamma Temple, ) Warasiguda, Secunderabad, ) Sitaphalmandi, Hyderabad, ) Telangana - 500 061 ) ...Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Bolla Malathi ) W/o Late Bolla Mohan ) R/A: Qtr No. 27/02, DAD ) Complex, Wanowrie Range, ) Pune - 411 040 ) 2. Union of India ) Through The Secretary ) Ministry of Defence, ) Government of India, ) South Block, ) New Delhi-110011 ) 3. The Principal Controller, ) Defence Accounts (SC) ) Having its office at No.1, ) Finance Road, Pune 411 001 ) 4. The Controller, ) Defence Accounts (Funds) ) Meeru Cantt, Meerut - 250 001) ...Respondents *** Mr. A.H. Fatangare, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Akshay Doctor a/w. Mr. Karan Jagtap, Mr. Parag Sawant, Mr. Sangharsha Shakya, Mr. P.R. Shakya, Mr. Aryan Parab and Ms. Priyanka Master, Advocates, i/by PS Chambers, for Respondent No.1. Mr. Aniruddha A. Garge, Advocate for Respondent No.2. *** Husen 1/9 WP-5756-2024 (J) C.doc CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. RESERVED ON : 16TH JANUARY, 2025 PRONOUNCED ON : 11TH FEBRUARY, 2025 JUDGMENT (Per M.M. Sathaye, J.) 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned counsel for the parties. 2. The Petitioner, a 79 year old mother, is challenging the judgment and order dated 12.10.2023 passed by the learned Member, Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, Mumbai (for short, ‘the Tribunal”) in Original Application No. 255 of 2022. By the said impugned order, the application of Respondent No.1 (deceased son’s widow) is partly allowed d