ANITA SHARMA vs VED PRAKASH GUPTA

Judgment text excerpt

$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 17.02.2025 + RC.REV. 214/2024 & CM APPL. 2163/2025 ANITA SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shiv Charan Garg & Mr. Imran, Advocates with Petitioner in person. versus VED PRAKASH GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Harshit Aggarwal & Ms. Muskan Gupta, Advocates with Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The Petitioner and Respondent are physically present in Court today. 2. Learned Counsel for the parties submit that the parties have amicably reached a resolution with respect to their inter se disputes. 3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions from the Petitioners, submits that the Petitioner needs additional time up to 30.09.2025 to vacate the tenanted premises. 4. Learned Counsel for the Respondent, on instructions from the Respondent, submits that the Respondent is agreeable to allow time up to 30.09.2025, subject to payment of user and occupation charges in the sum of Rs.3,600/- per month from December, 2024 onwards. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that this offer is acceptable to the Petitioner. 5. It is clarified that the payment of rental that has already been made by the Petitioner shall be adjusted by the Respondent against the user and Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HONEY ARORA Signing Date:18.02.2025 RC.REV. 214/2024 Page 1 of 3 22:56:56 occupation charges fixed today. 6. In view thereof, let an Undertaking by way of an Affidavit be filed by the Petitioner, within a week undertaking that: (i) The Petitioner shall hand over the physical possession of the premises i.e., one room on the ground floor at property bearing No.977/65, Lekhu Nagar, Tri Nagar, Delhi-110035 admeasuring 12.3ft x 7.9ft [herein