AMIT KUMAR VERMA & ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA

Judgment text excerpt

$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 11.02.2025 + W.P.(C) 1650/2025 AMIT KUMAR VERMA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr.Mandeep Baisala & Mr.Yashpal Yadav, Advs versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr.Mimansak Bhardwaj, SPC with Mr.Shubhashish Roy, Ms.Vidya Mishra, Advs. & Mr.Ankur, GP along with Mr.A.M. Balashed, AC/CISF, Mr.Atul, Mr.Prahlad, Mr.Amit, SI/CISF. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral) CM APPL. 8011/2025 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 8012/2025 3. This is an application seeking permission to file a lengthy synopsis and list of dates. 4. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 1650/2025 Page 1 of 3 By:SUNIL Signing Date:18.02.2025 11:38:52 5. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 1650/2025 6. This petition has been filed by the petitioners, praying for the following relief: “A direction to the Standing Screening Committee of the Respondent/CISF at CISF Headquarters, New Delhi to decide the correctness/antecedents of the documents produced by petitioners no.1 to 10, showing proof in support of the fact that no case/FIR is pending against them, within two weeks, as no cases, whatsoever, are pending against the petitioners herein.” 7. It is the case of the petitioners that the petitioners had applied for the post of Constable (General Duty). By a communication dated 23.01.2025, it has been informed to the petitioners that his case has been referred to the Standing Screening Committee on the ground that he was found to be involved in a criminal case before joining the Central Industrial Security Force. 8. The learned counsel for the pe