ABHIJEET KUMAR vs THE STATE OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Pronounced on: 10th February, 2025 + BAIL APPLN. 104/2025 ABHIJEET KUMAR S/o Sh. Ashok Singh R/o House No.76, Siras Pur Samai Pur Badli, PO Samai Pur Distt. North West, Delhi .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ranjana Singh, Mr. Pankaj Singh, Mr. Ritik Verma & Mr. Harsh Vardhan Mittal, Advocates. Versus (1) STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) (2) VICTIM M Through SHO .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Amit, Police Station Badli, Delhi Ms. Priyanka Kumar & Mr.Ravi Saroha, Advocates for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA JUDGMENT NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. 1. The Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Surkasha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as „B.N.S.S.’) read with Section 528 of B.N.S.S. (earlier known as 439 of the Code of Criminal Signature Not Verified DigitallySigned By:VIKAS ARORA BAIL APPLN. 104/2025 Page 1 of 7 Signing Date:11.02.2025 23:33:23 Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) read with Section 482 Cr.P.C.) has been filed on behalf of the Applicant for grant of Regular Bail in FIR No.526/2024 under Sections 376/377/506/509/323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’ hereinafter), registered at Police Station Samaypur Badli, Delhi. 2. It is stated in the Application that the Petitioner is in custody since 30.05.2024. It is submitted that the Complainant/Prosecutrix is a highly educated independent woman, aged around 24 years, open-minded and elder to the Applicant. The Applicant and the Complainant dated each other for quite long time and they were in deep love with each other. They had plans to get married and their families were aware about their relationship. Both of them used to travel out of Delhi on trips, including hill s