Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-12-10

X VICTIM vs THE STATE OF DELHI THROUGH S.H.O & ANR.

Citation / case number
CRL.REV.P.-1211/2023 2025:DHC:11251
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
X VICTIM
Respondent
THE STATE OF DELHI THROUGH S.H.O & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 10, 2025 CRL.REV.P. 1211/2023 & CRL.M.A. 30781/2023 X VICTIM .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Nikita Sharma & Mr. Akshay Mishra, Advs. versus THE STATE OF DELHI THROUGH S.H.O & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for the State along with Mr. Lalit Luthra, Adv. SI Sangeet Malik, PS Bindapur. Mr. Anurag Chauhan, Mr. Tajinder Singh & Ms. Kanishka Negi, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN AMIT MAHAJAN, J. (Oral) 1. The present Criminal Revision Petition has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (‘CrPC’) assailing the order on charge dated 04.05.2023 (hereinafter ‘impugned order’) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (SFTC) in case No. SC-234/2023, whereby the Respondent No. 2/Accused was discharged for the offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’) and the charge was directed to be framed only under Section 509 of the IPC. 2. Succinctly stated, the prosecution case originates from a written complaint dated 07.09.2022, submitted by the prosecutrix at Police Station Bindapur, wherein she alleged that she was res