Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-12-19

WRIT - C No. 43928 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 43928 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 43928 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 43928 of 2025 Parmanand And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus Additional Commissioner Administration Varanasi Region Varanasi And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Jay Prakash Maurya, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Rakesh Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Anand Bhaskar Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents and Sri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel representing the respondent-Gram Sabha. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondent No.1, the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Varanasi Region, Varanasi, to decide Case No. 1596 of 2014, [Parmanand and Others Vs. Tej Narain], under Section 333 of the U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act, 1950, arising out of proceedings under Section 176, within a stipulated time period. Counsel for the petitioners has referred to the 'order sheet' of the case, a copy whereof has been appended to the writ petition, to point out that although several

WRIT - C No. 43928 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam