Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-12-19

WRIT - C No. 42408 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 42408 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 42408 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 42408 of 2025 Sunai .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Singh Yadav, Satish Chandra Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Satish Chandra Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anand Bhaskar Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents. The present petition has been filed seeking to assail the order dated 17.03.2025 passed by the Additional Commissioner-I, Varanasi Division, Varanasi in Case No.9/2000-2001 (Computerized Case No.C200014000000017, Sukhai Vs. Savitri Devi), under Rule 285-I of the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 and for certain ancillary claims. Counsel appearing for the State-respondents has placed reliance upon the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Ram Swaroop and another Vs. Board of Revenue, UP at Lucknow and others), 1990 RD 291 (FB), to contend that the order passed by the Commissioner under Rule 285-I is judicial in nature and would be amenable to the revisional jurisdiction under Section 333 of the UP Zamindari A

WRIT - C No. 42408 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam