Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-12-18

WRIT - B No. 5130 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 5130 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 5130 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 5130 of 2025 Rohit Pandey And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Prayagraj And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Pandey, Sudhir Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Present petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondent no.2 to decide the Case No.1601 of 2025 (Raj Kumar and others vs. Ram Moorti and others), under Section 12 of U.P. C.H. Act (computerized No.T20255402323035169) within stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for redressal of his grievance, petitioner has filed Case No.1601 of 2025 before respondent No. 2, but till date no decision has been taken. Lastly, he submitted that a suitable direction may be issued to respondent no. 2 to decide the aforesaid case within stipulated period for which learned counsel for the respondents has no objection. 4. In

WRIT - B No. 5130 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam