Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-12-02

WRIT - B No. 4876 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 4876 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 4876 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 4876 of 2025 Smt. Mamta Alias Sadhana .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Singh, Vinod Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sunil Kumar Singh Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer clause of the writ petition during course of the day. 2. Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sharad Chandra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and learned counsel for the respondent- Gaon Sabha. 3. The instant petition has been filed for the following reliefs: "i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the Appeal No.52/202554115200000175 of 2025 (Bake Panwar vs. Mamta and others), under Section 21 (2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 pending in the Court of Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Meerut filed by respondent no.4 i-A. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to decide the Appeal No.52/202554115200000175 of 2025 (Bake Panwar vs. Mamt

WRIT - B No. 4876 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam