Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-12-19

WRIT - A No. 19321 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 19321 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 19321 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 19321 of 2025 Ashish Kumar Dwivedi .....Petitioner(s) Versus The State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arya Gautam, Atipriya Gautam, Jay Vishwanath Pandey, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Sri Vijay Gautam, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Saundarya Giri (AoR A/S 1258/24)holding brief of Ms. Arya Gautam, learned counsel for the writ petitioner has made a statement at bar that against the dismissal, the writ petitioner would prefer an appeal before the appropriate authority. 2. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same. 3. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer appeal and Respondents are required to decide the appeal within a period of two months from today. It goes without saying that all the contentions raised in the appeal shall be considered. (Vikas Budhwar,J.) December 19, 2025 Rajesh Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

WRIT - A No. 19321 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam