WRIT - A No. 18966 of 2025 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 18966 of 2025 Pankaj Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Himanshu Kumar Sharma, Rajeev Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Shri Mahesh Kumar (A/M 0261/2020), learned Advocate holding brief of Shri Rajeev Tiwari, learned counsel for the writ petitioner as well as Shri Mainsh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. A preliminary objection has been raised by the learned Standing Counsel for the State that the writ petitioner appears to be a resident of the same village, wherein respondent No. 5 has been engaged as Anganwadi Karyakatri. He submits that the writ petitioner has no locus standi and the present writ petition is nothing but a petition by a complainant and may not be maintainable. 3. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner could not dispute the said position. 4. Accordingly, interference is declined, since the writ petition itself is not maintainable. However, it is open for the respondents to take a call regarding the entitlement or admissibility of respondent No. 5 strictly in accordance