Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-12-12

WRIT - A No. 18785 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 18785 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 18785 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 18785 of 2025 Rihana Begam .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Balbir Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 7 HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State - respondents. After arguing the matter for quite sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer prayer no. (iii) to the extent that a direction be issued to respondent no. 2 to decide the claim of the petitioner as contained in representation dated 20.08.2025. To the said prayer, learned standing counsel has no objection. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to decide the petitioner's aforesaid application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably, within a period of four months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. It is made clear that the Court has not adjudicated the claim of the petitioner on merits. (Piyu

WRIT - A No. 18785 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam