Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-12-11

WRIT - A No. 18689 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 18689 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 18689 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 18689 of 2025 Nitin Shrivastava .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Chandra Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 7 HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State. The present writ petition has been filed for mandamus directing respondent no. 2 to decide representation of the petitioner dated 9.8.2024, within a stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. It has been stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that representation of the petitioner is pending consideration, which shall be decided within short time. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the said prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner. No useful purpose would be served by keeping this petition pending in view of the order, which the Court proposes to pass hereunder. Without entering into the controversy involved in the writ petition, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 9.8.2024, expeditiously, preferabl

WRIT - A No. 18689 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam