Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-12-05

WRIT - A No. 18398 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 18398 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 18398 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 18398 of 2025 Rajendra Prasad .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramod Kumar Gupta, Rajvendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rajvendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Prem Shankar Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that writ petitioner was appointed as Lekhpal in the year 1984, however, an audit objection was made. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that now the petitioner stands superannuated on 31.08.2022, but the petitioner is not being paid the post retiral benefits and now recovery is sought to be made. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the claim of the writ petitioner needs determination at the first instance by the respondent No.2. 4. To such a submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection and he gracefully accepts the same. 5. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer

WRIT - A No. 18398 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam