WRIT - A No. 18284 of 2025 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 18284 of 2025 Bheesham Pal Singh And 44 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Pandey, Vidya Nath Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Amit Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the writ petitioners and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Sri Amit Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the writ petitioner has made a statement at Bar as per the instructions received from his client that the writ petition be dismissed as withdawn with respect to petitioner Nos. 22, 24,, 25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 33, 42 and 43 with liberty to file afresh before the Court having territorial jurisdiction. 3. Rest of the petitioners, who are though currently working as Sub Inspector, claim benefit of one additional increment on completion of 19 years of service taking into account their initial training period. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the judgment of Ghanshyam Tiwari & Ors v. State of U.P. & Ors, Writ - A No. 44330 of 2012 and in the case of Dinesh Kumar Shukla & 1