Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-12-03

WRIT - A No. 18256 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 18256 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 18256 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 18256 of 2025 Om Prakash And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rajesh Yadav, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that so far as the writ petitioner no.1 is concerned, he was engaged as Seasonal Collection Peon on 05.01.1990, petitioner no.2 on 01.03.1989, petitioner no.3 on 01.02.1989, petitioner no.4 on 23.01.1992 and petitioner no.5 on 01.05.1991. The writ petitioners claim that they have worked till 01.04.2023, but they have not been engaged/regularized, whereas juniors to them have been accorded benefits. 3. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that the claim of the writ petitioner is to be decided at the first instance by Respondent no.2. 4. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy o

WRIT - A No. 18256 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam