Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-12-03

WRIT - A No. 18247 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 18247 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 18247 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 18247 of 2025 Satyam And 52 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Up And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nigamendra Shukla, Om Prakash Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioners who were working as Constable in State Police, want an additional increment of pay on completion of 19 years of service in the light of judgment of this Court in the case of Ghanshyam Tiwari vs. State of U.P. & others passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 44330 of 2012 which was followed in the judgment of Virendra Kumar and another v. State of U.P. & 3 Others, Writ - A No. 48601 of 2015 against which Special Appeal (Defective) No. 538 of 2016 came to be dismissed on 07.09.2016 so also the Special Leave Petition CC 6316 of 2017 came to be dismissed on 03.04.2017. 3. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner submits that this legal position has remained intact as on date and many such employees as petitioners

WRIT - A No. 18247 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam