Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-12-03

WRIT - A No. 18217 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 18217 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 18217 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 18217 of 2025 Ramraj Singh Yadav And 11 Other .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 10 Other .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dr. Vishnu Pandey, Piyush Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Piyush Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents. 2. The case of the writ petitioners is that they have worked the service period spent by them while undergoing training before they were appointed as constables and should be counted being 19 years of service for grant of one additional increment. They seek to rely upon the judgment in Special Appeal No. 172 of 2023 (State of U.P. and 6 others v. Ram Jeet Tiwari (H. Con.) and 6 others, decided on 19.04.2023. 3. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider the grievance of the writ petitioners. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the claim of the writ petitioners needs adjudication at the first instance by the concerned authorities. 5. To such a submission, learned counsel for the petitioners h

WRIT - A No. 18217 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam