Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-12-03

WRIT - A No. 18214 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 18214 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 18214 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 18214 of 2025 S.I. Vijay Singh And 9 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Ministry Of Home And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : R.P.S. Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate (Advocate Roll No.A/S- 0329/12) holding brief of Shri R.P.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Controversy raised in the present petition has already been adjudicated by this Court in Writ Petition No. 44330 of 2012 (Ghanshyam Tiwari & others vs. State of U.P. & others) against which a special appeal and S.L.P. has already been rejected. 3. This Court passed the following order on 07.09.2012 in the aforesaid writ petition: "The sole grievance raised of the petitioners in the present petition is as to whether the period spent on training prior to appointment as a Constable in the Police Department can be counted for granting them promotional pay scale. I have heard Shri Rajesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. This issue was examined

WRIT - A No. 18214 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam