Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-12-05

WRIT - A No. 17970 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 17970 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 17970 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 17970 of 2025 Avinash Prakash Pathak .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Narendra Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Instructions filed today is taken on record marked as Appendix 'A'. 2. Heard Shri Narendra Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the writ petitioner as well as Shri Gaurav Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed as a Constable in the Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC) on 20.10.1998, though the writ petitioner was imposed with a punishment, he preferred Writ-A No. 63006 of 2025 (Avinash Prakash Pathak Vs. State of U.P. and others) against the order of the State Administrative Tribunal, which came to be allowed on 19.03.2025. However, the writ petitioner has not been considered for promotion to the higher post. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that claim of the writ petitioner needs determination at the first instance by the respondent No.3. 5. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar and looking into the overall facts

WRIT - A No. 17970 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam