Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-12-05

WRIT - A No. 17950 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 17950 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 17950 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 17950 of 2025 Sunil .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pawan Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Pawan Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Vijay Lal, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case/grievance of the writ petitioner is that he was engaged as a Home-Guard in the year 1996, but he has not been given work since 2021. Recommendations have been relied upon by the learned counsel for the writ petitioner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that the claim of the writ petitioner needs determination at the first instance by Respondent no.3. 4. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before Respondent no.3, who on the said motion shall proceed to consider the claim of the writ petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two

WRIT - A No. 17950 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam