WRIT - A No. 17297 of 2025 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 17297 of 2025 Hetram .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hanuman Kinkar, Vinay Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Shri Vinay Kumar, learned counsel for the writ petitioner as well as Shri Vivek Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that he is working on the post of Class IVth (Daily Wager) since the year 2008 and he seeks benefit and emoluments as 7th Pay Commission on the basis of Government Order of 6th Pay Scale Commission. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that petitioner is only working for the past three years. However, the claim of the writ petitioner needs determination at the first instance by the respondent No.3. 4. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar and looking into the overall facts and situation, the writ petition stands disposed off directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self- attested copy of the writ petition and certified copy of this order before the respondent No.3, who shall on t