VISHAL vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 19150/2025 & CM APPL. 79725/2025 VISHAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pankaj Mehta, Ms. Shweta Soni, Ms. Akansha Singh, Mr. Apaar Puri, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sahaj Garg, SPC with Mr. Sanjay Pal, GP Insp Athurv and Mr. Ramniwas Yadav CRPF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 17.12.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. After hearing learned Counsel for the parties and given the facts of the case, we are inclined to dispose of this writ petition without calling for a reply. 2. Mr. Garg, learned SPC for the respondents, has graciously agreed. 3. The issue is brief. 4. The petitioner has been disqualified for recruitment to the post Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 19150/2025 Digitally Signed By:AJIT Page 1 of 3 KUMAR Signing Date:19.12.2025 15:26:49 of Constable/GD in the CAPF on the ground that he had hematuria and hydroureteronephrosis. 5. It is common knowledge that hematuria and hydroureteronephrosis are normal sequelae of urinary tract infection. 6. The petitioner underwent a Detailed Medical Examination on 1 December 2025 and Review Medical Examination on 2 December 2025. 7. A person who suffers from urinary tract infection cannot recover overnight. 8. Accordingly, given the special facts of this case and the nature of the ailment of the petitioner, we deem it appropriate in the interests of justice that the petitioner should be examined once more by a competent medical board which should include a urologist or a nephrologist. 9. Let the petitioner be examined on 27 December 2025 at 11 am. 10. In the meantime, Mr. Sahaj Garg learned SPC for the respondents, would inform of the place and time where the petitioner should pr