VIPIN KUMAR MANAKTALA, vs SHRI VINOD KUMAR DEAD THROUGH LR SHRI KARUN MANAKTALA & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 12.12.2025 Judgment pronounced on: 17.12.2025 Judgment uploaded on: 17.12.2025 + FAO(OS) 83/2023, CM APPL. 36897/2023, CM APPL. 31995/2024, CM APPL. 7142/2025, CM APPL. 76671/2025 and CM APPL. 76672/2025 VIPIN KUMAR MANAKTALA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ashish Dholakia, Sr. Adv. along with Mr. Subhoday Banerjee and Mr. Ritesh Chowdhary, Advs. versus SHRI VINOD KUMAR DEAD THROUGH LR SHRI KARUN MANAKTALA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. B. K. Sood, Mr. Manik Sood and Ms. Jyotsna Bhardwaj, Advs. for R-1, 2, 3 and 7. Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. along with Mr. Rajender Agarwal and Mr. Anoop Kumar, Advs. for R-4. Mr. Ashok Chhabra and Mr. Kunal Jaggi, Advs. for R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR JUDGMENT ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. 1. The Plaintiff assails the correctness of the order passed on 04.07.2023 [hereinafter referred to as ‘Impugned Order’] by the Signature Not Verified Signed By:JAI NARAYAN Signing Date:17.12.2025FAO(OS) 83/2023 Page 1 of 14 11:25:15 learned Single Judge [hereinafter referred to as ‘LSJ’], while modifying the injunction order passed on 22.12.2020. Now, as per modified order, the Defendants [the Respondents herein] have been restrained from alienating, 25% of the Suit Property. 2. For sake of convenience, the parties before this court shall be referred to in accordance with their status before the LSJ. FACTUAL MATRIX 3. In order to comprehend the issues involved in the present case, it is imperative to cull out the genealogy of the family and the relevant background facts, which are set forth hereinafter. 4. The genealogy of the family reads as under: 5. While instituting the suit and the interim applications, the Plaintiff