VAKEEL AHMED vs KAMLESH GUPTA

Judgment text excerpt

$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 06.12.2025 + CM(M) 2915/2024 & CM APPL. 39035/2024 VAKEEL AHMED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naushad Ahmad Khan, Advocate. versus KAMLESH GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sachin Gupta and Mr. Rohit Pradhan, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) 1. This petition was filed by the judgment debtor, assailing orders dated 17.05.2022, 02.06.2023, 29.04.2024 and 31.05.2024 of the learned execution court. However, by way of order dated 15.07.2024, the petitioner/judgment debtor withdrew the challenge against order dated 02.06.2023. As such, presently, only three orders are assailed in this petition. 2. I have heard learned counsel for both sides. The only argument advanced by learned counsel for petitioner/judgment debtor is that the petitioner had already restored possession of the subject property to the present respondent/decree holder in the month of October 2014. No other CM(M) 2915/2024 Page 1 of 4 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA Signature Not Verified GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 Digitally Signed 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801 e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.12.06 16:21:15 -08'00' By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:06.12.2025 16:48:12 argument has been advanced. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent/decree holder supports the impugned orders and contends that the petitioner/ judgment debtor is trying to hoodwink the courts at different levels. 3. By way of order dated 17.05.2022, the learned execution court dismissed the objections of the petitioner/judgme