Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-12-03

UOI & ORS vs RAJESH BHUTANI

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-7108/2007 2025:DHC:10932-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
UOI & ORS
Respondent
RAJESH BHUTANI
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 03.12.2025 W.P.(C) 7108/2007 UOI & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mukul Singh (CGSC), Ms.Ira Singh, Mr. Aryan Dhaka Advs. versus RAJESH BHUTANI .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed challenging the Order dated 08.06.2007 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’), in O.A. No. 976 of 2005, titled Rajesh Bhutani v. Union Of India & Ors., allowing the O.A. filed by the respondent herein, with the following directions: “14. We set aside the Annexure A-1 dated 25.12.2004 as well as the appellate order. At this distance of time, it may not serve any purpose by remitting the matter for a de novo inquiry. Taking notice of the totality of the circumstances, we direct that the applicant is to be readmitted to duty, but, of course, he has to suffer inconvenience, for the manner, in which he had conducted himself, while employed as a railway servant. The applicant is to be reengaged, in the post in which he was employed at the time of

UOI & ORS vs RAJESH BHUTANI · Niyam