Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Bombay High Court · 2025-12-02

UNIQUE ENTERPRISES vs UNION OF INDIA (SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPT.) AND ANR

Citation / case number
WP/2343/2021
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
UNIQUE ENTERPRISES
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA (SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPT.) AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

Digitally signed by MULEY MULEY SHUBHAM SHUBHAM PRAVINRAO PRAVINRAO Date: WP-2343-2021.DOCX 2025.12.02 15:27:07 +0530 Shubham IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2343 OF 2021 M/s. Unique Enterprises Through its Prop. Shri Fardoon Minoo Irani Age 56 years, residing at 19, Armaann Villa Malcolm Baug, Jogeshwari (W), Mumbai 400 102 ...Petitioner Vs. 1. Union of India Through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Dept. of Revenue, Branch Secretariat, Ministry of Law & Justice, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai – 400 020 2. The Designated Committee Under SVLDRS, 2019 CGST Commissionerate Mumbai (East), Lotus Info Centre, Parel (East), Mumbai 400 012 ...Respondents ______________________________________________________ Ms. Kiran Doiphode i/by V. M. Doiphode & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. Karan Adik a/w S. D. Deshpande for the Respondents. ______________________________________________________ CORAM : M.S. Sonak & Advait M. Sethna, JJ. RESERVED ON : 25 November 2025 PRONOUNCED ON : 02 December 2025 Judgment:- (Per Advait M. Sethna, J.) Page 1 of 21 WP-2343-2021.DOCX 1. This is a Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Petitioner prays, mainly, for quashing and setting aside form SVLDRS-3 issued to the Petitioner under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (“said Scheme” for short) demanding an amount of Rs.12,93,408/- under Arrears category. This forms the subject matter of challenge in the present Petition. The substantive prayers read thus: - “(b) to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other similar writ or order under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records and proceedings from the office of the Second Respondent and after perusing and examining t

UNIQUE ENTERPRISES vs UNION OF INDIA (SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPT.) AND ANR · Niyam