Bombay High Court · 2025-12-19
THE BANK OF INDIA STAFF PANCHSHEEL CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOC LTD vs JITENDRA KUMAR JANI AND ORS
- Citation / case number
- WP/8889/2024
- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Petitioner
- THE BANK OF INDIA STAFF PANCHSHEEL CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOC LTD
- Respondent
- JITENDRA KUMAR JANI AND ORS
Judgment text excerpt
wp8889-2024-J.doc AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8889 OF 2024 The Bank of India Staff Panchsheel Cooperative Housing Society Limited, A Society registered under the provisions of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies ATUL Act, 1960, having its office at Plot No.83-B, GANESH Bharadawadi Road, Near Sant Ramdas KULKARNI Digitally signed by ATUL GANESH Garden, Andheri (West), Mumbai 400 058 … Petitioner KULKARNI Date: 2025.12.19 11:47:52 +0530 V/s. 1. Jitendra Kumar Jani, Age 50 years, Adult, Indian Inhabitant, Occupation Business, and residing at B/42, The Bank of India Staff Panchsheel CHS Ltd., Bharadawadi Road, Near Sant Ramdas Garden, Andheri (West), Mumbai 400 058 2. The Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, K West Ward, having his office at MHADA Building, Bandra (East), Mumbai – 400 050 3. Vikas R. Korade, The Authorized Officer, having address at Office of Ld. Deputy Registrar, Coop. Societies, K West Ward, having his office at MHADA Building, Bandra (East), Mumbai 400 050 … Respondents 1 wp8889-2024-J.doc Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar with Ms. Rachna Mamnani i/by Mr. Prashant P. Kulkarni for the petitioner. Mr. Nikhil Rajeshirke with Mr. Vishwajeet Kapse and Mr. Saurabh Rajeshirke for respondent No.1. Ms. Kavita N. Solunke, Additional G.P. with Mr. Hamid Mulla, AGP for respondent No.2-State. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. RESERVED ON : DECEMBER 15, 2025 PRONOUNCED ON : DECEMBER 19, 2025 JUDGMENT: 1. The petitioner society, by the present petition, has called in question the order passed by the Co operative Appellate Court, whereby the petitioner’s application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking dismissal of the dispute was rejected. The application was founded on the contention that the