THE ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR vs DR. MADHU BHARDWAJ

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 10.11.2025 Pronounced on: 22.12.2025 + W.P.(C) 1371/2018 THE ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.S.R. Krishna and Mr.V. Shashank Kumar, Advs. versus DR. MADHU BHARDWAJ .....Respondent Through: Ms. Pallavi Parmar, Mr.Chirayu Jain, Ms. Raksha Awasya and Ms. Tanishqua Dhar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN JUDGMENT MADHU JAIN, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the Order dated 28.07.2016 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘Tribunal’), in O.A. No. 4120/2013, titled Dr. Madhu Bhardwaj v. AIIMS., whereby, the learned Tribunal disposed of the O.A. filed by the respondent herein with the following directions: “8. In view of above observations, I issue the following directions to the respondent: I) Take into account the services rendered by the applicant as Sr. Research Fellow from February, 1979 to April, 1983 for computing her qualifying years of service for the purpose of pensionary benefits in accordance when the decision of governing body of Allies dated Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 1371/2018 Signed By:RENUKA Page 1 of 22 NEGI Signing Date:22.12.2025 17:59:37 07.09.2002 (Annexure-B) II) Compute the applicant's qualifying years of service in accordance with Rule 13 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. While doing so, keep in mind the direction contained in (I) supra. III) If the applicant is found to have rendered adequate qualifying years of service in the light of (I)& (II), supra, grant her pension w.e.f. April, 2003. IV) Do not to recover any amount in lieu of the notice period as there has been inexplicable delay at the end o