STATE vs RAVINDER @ KUKU & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 15.11.2025 Judgment delivered on: 02.12.2025 + CRL.A. 960/2015 STATE .....Appellant versus RAVINDER @ KUKU & ANR. .....Respondent Memo of Appearance For the Appellant: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the State with Insp. Praveen Kumar. For the Respondent: Mr. Vikas Padora and Mr. Tushar Malik, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Javed Ali, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN JUDGMENT 1. State takes exception to judgment dated 29.09.2014, whereby respondents Ravinder @ Kuku and Deepak @ Kala have been acquitted of all the charges levelled against them. 2. Let us take note of the relevant facts. 3. On 14.05.2006, an information was received by the police at around 11:25 p.m. that a person had been shot in front of Parshu Ram Dharamshala, Shiv Ram Park, Nangloi, New Delhi. 4. On receiving such information, SI Raghubir Singh (PW-23) and Constable Kanak Bhushan (PW-12) reached House No. C-1, Shiv Ram Park, Main Najafgarh Road, New Delhi. 5. They noticed a motorcycle lying in front of said house, and learnt that injured had already been removed to Maharaja Agrasen Hospital. 6. SI Raghubir Singh left for the hospital, while Constable Kanak Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CRL.A. 960/2015 Page 1 of 14 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:02.12.2025 12:33:10 Bhushan remained there for preservation of the spot. 7. SI Raghubir Singh collected the MLC of injured, Sunil, which revealed that he had suffered a gunshot injury. 8. However, he did not meet any eye-witness at the hospital and returned to the spot. He requisitioned the crime team for inspection of the spot. He prepared a rukka and sent the same to PS at 12.45 a.m. for registration of the FIR. By that ti