Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-12-02

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 960 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 960 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 960 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 960 of 2025 Rohit Kumar .....Appellant(s) Versus Union of India and 6 others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Aniruddh Azad, Jay Shankar Tiwari, Mani Shanker Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Arvind Kumar Goswami, Hem Pratap Singh Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 04.12.2024 passed in Writ C No. 34065 of 2024. 2. The appeal is barred by 301 days. 3. An application, supported by an affidavit, seeking condonation of delay has been filed, which is absolutely cursory. 4. A supplementary affidavit has been filed, however, a perusal of the order impugned dated 04.12.2024 passed in Writ C No. 34065 of 2024 indicates that the petition before the learned Single Judge was withdrawn by the petitioner-appellant with specific indication 'without any further liberty'. 5. Counsel for the appellant attempted to dispute the contents of the order dated 04.12.2024 regarding the withdrawal of the petition. 6. The submissions made seeking to dispute the contents of the order dated 04.12.2024, cannot be counten

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 960 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam