Bombay High Court · 2025-12-18
SMT. SUVARNA HARISHCHANDRA CHAVAN vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR DEPT. OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND ORS
- Citation / case number
- WP/12107/2022
- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Petitioner
- SMT. SUVARNA HARISHCHANDRA CHAVAN
- Respondent
- THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR DEPT. OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND ORS
Judgment text excerpt
201-WP-12107-2022.odt Digitally signed IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY GAYATRI by GAYATRI RAJENDRA RAJENDRA SHIMPI SHIMPI Date: 2025.12.23 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 11:55:06 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 12107 OF 2022 Smt. Suvarna Harishchandra Chavan Aged 68 Yrs, Occ. Art Teacher R/o. A-1/8, Second Flr, Gautam Centre Tilak Road, Thane (E) … Petitioner Versus 1] The State of Maharashtra Through department of Social Justice and Special Assistant 2] The Accountant General, State of Maharashtra, Mumbai, Having Office at Pratishtha Bhavan, 101, M.K. Marg, Churchgate, Mumbai-20. 3] The Commissioner, Commissionerate of Disability Affairs, for State of Maharashtra Pune. 4] District Social Welfare Officer Zilla Parishad Thane 5] The Chairman, Bharatiya Stri-Jeevan Vikas Parishad Jijamata Marg, Thane (East).400603 6] The Headmaster Kamalini Karnabadhir Vidayalaya Jijamata Marg, Thane (East).400603 … Respondents **** Mr. Satyajeet Rajeshirke, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.H. Kankal, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 – State. Mr. Shrishail Sakhare, Advocate for Respondent No.4. Gayatri Shimpi 1 201-WP-12107-2022.odt **** CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. DATE : 18th DECEMBER, 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT : (PER : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties. 2. We have considered the strenuous submissions of the learned Advocates appearing for the parties. The question is as to whether the Petitioner was working in an Institution which received 100% grants-in-aid from the Government, prior to the cut-off date of 01.11.2005, in the light of the Government Resolution dated 31.10.2005, so as to make him eligible for Pension as per the Old Pension Scheme. 3. The Petitioner has put forth prayer clauses (a