SHRREEYA DEVELOPERS vs SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY, THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

067. Petitioner versus 1. Slum Rehabilitation Authority, Mumbai 2. The Competent Authority-7, SRA, Mumbai. 3. The Deputy Collector (Special Division), SRA, Mumbai. 4. The State of Maharashtra. Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.39060 OF 2025 Shrreeya Developers Applicant In the matter between : New Shree Krishna SRA CHS through Chief Promotor Shantaram Dajiba Kamble, CTS Nos.846 & 834 (Part) of Village Laljipada, Sanjay Nagar, Wadilal Gosalya Road, Kandivali (West), Tal.Borivali, Mumbai-400 067. Petitioner versus 1. Slum Rehabilitation Authority, Mumbai Respondents _______ Mr.Amogh Singh with Mr.Atul Singh, Mr.Rahul Arora i/by Manoj Pandey for Petitioner. Mr.Vaibhav Charalwar with Mr.Santosh Pathak, Mr.Nimish Lohikar, Mr.Kailash Pathak, Mr.Deepesh Kadam i/by Law Origin for Applicant/Intervenor. Mr.Saurabh Pakale with Ms.Ravleen Sabharwal for Respondent nos.1 and 3 SRA. Ms.Poonak Mittal, AGP, for Respondent no.4 State. _______ Manish Thatte 904.WP.5119.2024.DOC CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & AARTI SATHE, JJ. DATE: 4th December 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT (G.S.Kulkarni) :- 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties heard finally. 2. This is another unfortunate cas