Bombay High Court · 2025-12-24
SHIVRAJ NAGAR CO OP HSG SOC LTD THR CHAIRMAN vs MEXTECH REALTY PVT LTD AND ORS
- Citation / case number
- WP/10951/2025
- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Petitioner
- SHIVRAJ NAGAR CO OP HSG SOC LTD THR CHAIRMAN
- Respondent
- MEXTECH REALTY PVT LTD AND ORS
Judgment text excerpt
wp-10949-2025& connected,doc.doc AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ATUL GANESH WRIT PETITION NO. 10949 OF 2025 KULKARNI WITH Digitally signed by ATUL GANESH WRIT PETITION NO. 10950 OF 2025 KULKARNI WITH Date: 2025.12.24 11:28:22 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 10951 OF 2025 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10952 OF 2025 1. Shivraj Nagar Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. Through Chairman/Secretary, Near Nitin Company, Almeida Road, Panchapakhadi, Thane (W) 400602. … Petitioner V/s. 1. Mextech Realty Pvt. Ltd., Formerly known as Nandivardhan Constructions Pvt. Ltd., 2403, A-Wing, Marathon Futurex, Mafatlal Mills Compound, N. M. Joshi Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai 400013, through Director, Anil Mutha. 2. The Dy. Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Thane City, Vardhavat Mansion, 2nd floor, Shivaji Road, Thane (W), Dist. Thane. 3 The Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Kokan Division, Kokan Bhavan, 3rd Floor, Navi Mumbai – 400614. … Respondents 1 wp-10949-2025& connected,doc.doc Mr. A.R. Gole along with Ms. Vishwali V. Botle for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Thorat i/by Mr. Prayag Joshi, for Respondent No.1. Smt. S. R. Crasto, AGP for the State – Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 in WP No. 10949/2025. Shri P. V. Nelson Rajan, AGP for the State – Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 in WP No. 10950/2025. Smt. S. D. Chipade, AGP for the State – Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 in WP No. 10951/2025. Smt. M.S. Shrivastav, AGP for the State – Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 in WP No. 10952/2025. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. RESERVED ON : DECEMBER 22, 2025 PRONOUNCED ON : DECEMBER 24, 2025 JUDGMENT: 1. Since all the writ petitions raise identical questions of law and arise from the same set of facts, they are heard together and decided by this common judgment. 2. The petitioner has called in question the Judgment