Delhi High Court · 2025-12-12
SHEETAL GOYAL vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR.
- Citation / case number
- W.P.(C)-18879/2025 2025:DHC:11330
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- SHEETAL GOYAL
- Respondent
- MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR.
Judgment text excerpt
$~43 to 45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decisioin:12th December, 2025 + W.P.(C) 18879/2025 & CM APPL. 78614/2025 SHEETAL GOYAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Mr. Aman Goel, Mr. Saurav Yadav, Advocates (M:8630180959) versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, SC-MCD with Mr. Parvin Bansal, Advocate (M:9911991166) 44 + W.P.(C) 18880/2025 & CM APPL. 78617/2025 MANJU GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Mr. Aman Goel, Mr. Saurav Yadav, Advocates (M:8630180959) versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Standing Counsel for MCD (M: 9811551525) 45 + W.P.(C) 18882/2025 & CM APPL. 78626/2025 RANI GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Mr. Aman Goel, Mr. Saurav Yadav, Advocates (M:8630180959) versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Mahajan, Advocate for MCD Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:13.12.2025 18:47:13 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA MINI PUSHKARNA, J. (ORAL): 1. The present writ petitions have been filed in respect of the sealing of the property bearing Nos. 226-227, Gali Kunjas, Dariba Kalan, Chandni Chowk, Delhi, owned by the petitioners. 2. This Court notes that another set of petitioners had approached this Court with respect to the same property, in W.P.(C) 16504/2025 and other connected matters, wherein, the Court took notice of the submissions that the respondents without any prior intimation, show cause notice or speaking order, had sealed the properties of the petitioners. 3. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for the respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents draws the attention of this Court to