Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-12-17

SH. SUMIT AND ORS vs STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

Citation / case number
CRL.M.C.-9018/2025 2025:DHC:11484
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SH. SUMIT AND ORS
Respondent
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~86 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 17.12.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C. 9018/2025 & CRL.M.A. 37672/2025EXEMPTION FROM FILING CERTIFIED COPIES ETC SH. SUMIT AND ORS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Sharma, Adv. with all petitioners in person. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP with SI Deepak, PS Naraina. Mr. Sandeep Tyagi, Adv. for R- 2 & R-3. with R-2 and R-3 in person. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT(ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No.152/2025, dated 13.03.2025, registered at P.S Naraina, Delhi under Sections 118(1)/3(5) BNS (324/34 IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. CRL.M.C. 9018/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:17.12.2025 17:23:53 2. As per allegations, petitioners assaulted respondent no. 2 with a sharp object. FIR no. 152/2025 was lodged at the instance of respondent no. 2 under sections 118(1)/3(5) BNS against the petitioners. It is submitted that charge sheet has since been filed under Section 117(2) BNS. 3. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and the terms of settlement have been reduced in the form of a Compromise Deed dated 23.05.2025. It is submitted that petitioners have paid the entire settlement amount of Rs. 60,000/- (Rupees Sixty Thousand only) to respondent no. 2. Copy of Compromise Deed dated 23.05.2025 has been annexed as Annexure B. 4. Parties are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer SI Deepak,

SH. SUMIT AND ORS vs STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. · Niyam