SANJIV NARULA vs PARGAT SINGH AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 20.12.2025 + CM(M) 2448/2025 SANJIV NARULA .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Shashi Kiran, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nikhil Kumar Sharma and Ms. Jashmine Minj, Advocates versus PARGAT SINGH AND ANR .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) 1. Petitioner/plaintiff has assailed order dated 17.09.2025 of the learned trial court, whereby his application under Order VII Rule 14(3) CPC and Order XVI Rule 1(3) CPC read with Section 151 CPC (moved subsequent to part hearing of final arguments) was dismissed. Having heard learned senior counsel for petitioner at length, I do not find it a fit case to even issue notice. Rather, the present petition is found to be completely frivolous and filed with oblique purposes to somehow delay disposal of the subject suit, which is pending since the year 2012. 2. Broadly speaking, the circumstances relevant for present purposes are that in the subject suit filed by the petitioner/plaintiff for recovery of CM(M) 2448/2025 Page 1 of 5 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, Signature Not Verified 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835 d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2ee e60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally Signed Date: 2025.12.20 14:22:35 -08'00' By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:20.12.2025 14:39:12 possession of immovable property, damages, mesne profits, declaration and permanent injunction, the present respondents/defendants filed a detailed Written Statement and after framing of issues, the suit was taken through full dress trial. During final arguments, th