RP PARASHAR vs MCD AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 13.11.2025 Pronounced on: 04.12.2025 + W.P.(C) 8522/2011 RP PARASHAR .....Petitioner Through: In-person. versus MCD AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Beenashaw Soni, SC with Ms.Mansi Jain, Adv. for MCD CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN JUDGMENT NAVIN CHAWLA, J. 1. This petition has been filed challenging the Order dated 16.07.2009 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as, „Tribunal‟) in T.A. No. 170/2009, titled Dr. R.P. Parashar and Ors. v. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr., dismissing the same with the following findings: “11. … We note that as per the orders of Hon'ble Lok Adalat, the MCD vide its order dated 7.12.2005 appointed the Applicant No.1 (Dr. R P. Parashar) to the post of Vaid redesignated as Medical Officer (Ayurveda) on regular basis in the pay scale of Rs. 8000- 13500. It is also noted that the appointment was not made retrospectively in view of the settlement arrived between the parties. 12. We also find that the Applicant No.1, who joined under the 1975 Regulation, was governed by the promotion quota system then available for the post. Further, he was selected by the direct recruitment process in the year 1989. His case was well covered and protected Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W,P.(C) 8522/2011 Page 1 of 11 By:REYMON VASHIST Signing Date:04.12.2025 18:12:53 by the judgment of Hon'ble High court of Delhi in Amir Raza Zaidi's case (supra). In this backdrop, his appointment as Medical officer (Ayurveda) by MCD has been in compliance of the directions issued by Hon'ble High Court and Lok Adalat. xxx 14. Taking into account the total facts and circumstances of