Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-12-22

ROHIT @ AMAN vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Citation / case number
CRL.REV.P.-439/2025 2025:DHC:11741
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
ROHIT @ AMAN
Respondent
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 12th November, 2025 Pronounced on: 22nd December, 2025 + CRL.REV.P. 439/2025 ROHIT @ AMAN S/o Sh. Raj inder R/o A-8, Bapu Park, Kotla Mubarak Pur Delhi .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajpal Kasana, Ms. Moni Rexwal, Mr. Digamber Phagna and Mr. Abhishek Baisoya, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through SHO P.S: Kotla Mubarak Pur .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with SI Nitesh Yadav. + CRL.REV.P. 442/2025 AMIT @ KALU S/o Sh. Rajinder R/o A-8, Bapu Park, Kotla Mubarak Pur Delhi .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajpal Kasana, Ms. Moni Rexwal, Mr. Digamber Phagna and Mr. Abhishek Baisoya, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through SHO P.S: Kotla Mubarak Pur .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with SI Nitesh Yadav. CORAM: Signature Not Verified CRL.REV.P.439/2025 & 442/2025 Page 1 of 9 DigitallySigned By:RITA SHARMA Signing Date:23.12.2025 13:27:01 HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. 1. The above two Revision Petitions under Section 442 BNSS have been filed on behalf of the Petitioners Rohit @ Aman and Amit @ Kalu challenging the Order dated 31.10.2025 by which learned Trial Court had cancelled the Bail granted vide Order dated 13.10.2025, in FIR No.275/2025 under Sections 109/125/110/115(2)/126(2)/351(2)/3(5) BNS and Sections 25/27 Arms Act, registered at Police Station: Kotla Mubarakpur. 2. The case of the Prosecution in brief, is that present FIR No.275/2025 was registered on Complaint of Sh. Chander Prakash, who stated that he had lost about Rs.1.5 lacs to Petitioner Rohit in a gambling game in Pilanji, Kotla Mubarakpur, about 06 months back. He was unable to repay the money. Consequently, there was a dispute between him an

ROHIT @ AMAN vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI · Niyam