RINAL INVESTMENT PVT. LTD vs M/S OMSONS MARKETING PVT. LTD

Judgment text excerpt

$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 18.12.2025 + CM(M) 2436/2025, CM APPL. 79842/2025, CM APPL. 79843/2025 & CM APPL. 79841/2025 RINAL INVESTMENT PVT. LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. N.P. Singh and Mr. Barun Dey, Advocates versus M/S OMSONS MARKETING PVT. LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) 1. Petitioner/defendant has assailed two orders, both dated 05.12.2025 passed by the learned commercial court, whereby its applications under Order VI Rule 17 CPC and under Order XI Rule 1(10) CPC were dismissed. Having heard learned counsel for petitioner/defendant, I do not find it a fit case to even issue notice. Rather, the petition appears to be an effort to somehow derail the trial. 2. Broadly speaking, when the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff against the petitioner/defendant for recovery of Rs.17,51,499.38 was listed for plaintiff’s evidence, the petitioner/defendant filed two applications, one CM(M) 2436/2025 Page 1 of 5 pages Signature Not Verified GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835 d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2ee e60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally Signed Date: 2025.12.18 17:31:23 -08'00' By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:18.12.2025 17:33:30 being under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, while the other being under Order XI Rule 1(10) CPC, both of which were dismissed by way of two separate orders on the same day, which orders have been impugned in this petition. 3. It is contended on behalf of petitioner/defendant that they learned about certain unders