Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-12-16

RANJANA RAJAGOPALAN vs LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-4332/2021 2025:DHC:11386-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RANJANA RAJAGOPALAN
Respondent
LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 17.10.2025 Pronounced on: 16.12.2025 W.P.(C) 4332/2021 & CM APPL. 13232/2021 RANJANA RAJAGOPALAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr.D. N. Goburdhun, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Hemant Phalpher, Adv. versus LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Tushar Sannu, Standing Counsel and Ms. Aqsa, Adv. for GNCTD/R-1 & R-2 Mr.Aayush Agarwala, Mr.Prakash Jha and Ms.Mallina Luthra, Advs. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN JUDGMENT NAVIN CHAWLA, J. 1. The present petition has been filed, praying for the following reliefs: “A] issue an appropriate Writ, Order, or Directions to declare Rule 91, Form 17 of Delhi Cooperative Society Rule 2007, as manifestly arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 19[1][c], 21, 300A of the Constitution of India; B] to declare, that Rule 91 Form 17, being Subordinate Legislation, is contrary to Section 78, 79, 80 of the present Act and is therefore ultravires of the Act and unconstitutional and void/ nullity; 22. G] Writ, Order Direction, reading down Rule 91, that Rule 91 does not violate any Fundamental Right nor parent act provision are violated as under `Nomination’