Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Bombay High Court · 2025-12-19

RANGAMMA SOUNDAPPA CHETTY vs PALANISWAMY OBULI CHETTY

Citation / case number
AO/360/2019
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
RANGAMMA SOUNDAPPA CHETTY
Respondent
PALANISWAMY OBULI CHETTY
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

rsk 1 918-AO-360-19.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 360 OF 2019 Rangamma Soundappa Chetty Occupation:Housewife, Hindu, Indian Inhabitant of Bombay, Residing at premises No.3, Parawatibai Chawl, Hingwala Plot, Nityanand Nagar, Ghatkopar (W), ….Appellant Mumbai-400 086 (Original Defendant) Versus Palaniswamy Obuli Chetty Occupation: Service, Hindu, Indian Inhabitant of Bombay, Residing at premises No.1, Parawatibai Chawl, Hingwala Plot, Nityanand Nagar, …Respondent Ghatkopar (W), Mumbai-400 086 (Original Plaintiff) __________________________________________________________________ Mr. Ramprakash Pandey a/w. Mr. Udaybhan Tiwari, for the Appellant. Mr. Arvind Taral, for the Respondent. __________________________________________________________________ CORAM : JITENDRA JAIN, J. DATED : 19th DECEMBER 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. This appeal is filed against the order of the Trial Court whereby the Court has refused to take written statement of the original defendant on the ground of delay. 2. On the earlier occasion, the Court directed the siblings to appear 3. The facts of the present proceedings reminds this Court about two fe