RAHUL KHURANA vs STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: December 18th, 2025 + BAIL APPLN. 3416/2025, CRL.M.A. 26687/2025, CRL.M.A. 26688/2025 & CRL.M.A. 31665/2025 RAHUL KHURANA .....Applicant Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Alok Kumar Pandey & Mr. Shekhar Sharma, Advs. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State SI Mahavir Singh, PS- DIV/ Outer Distt. Mr. Archit Kaushik, Adv. for R2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN AMIT MAHAJAN, J. (Oral) 1. The present application is filed seeking pre-arrest bail in FIR No. 170/2025 dated 08.04.2025 registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar West for offences under Sections 420/406/467/468/471/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’). 2. Briefly stated, the FIR was registered on a complaint given by one Parminder Singh alleging that he invested a sum of ₹10,00,000/- with the accused persons including the applicant in the form of bank transfer, crypto currency transfer and cash on an assurance given by the accused persons that the complainant Signature Not Verified Signed By:HARMINDER would get a triple return on his investment. It is alleged that the KAUR Signing Date:20.12.2025 BAIL APPLN. 3416/2025 Page 1 of 5 17:39:39 complainant made the investments in the year 2021 and has not received any amount till date. 3. This Court, by order dated 08.09.2025, while granting interim protection to the applicant on him showing his bona fide and depositing a sum of ₹10,00,000/- with the Registrar General of this Court, had noted that even though it was claimed that there are multiple victims, the chargesheet had already been filed in regard to the complaint made by the complainant. It was also noted that while the applicant was evading the process of l