Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-12-11

RACHIT KATYAL vs SURESH KUMAR TANEJA & ANR.

Citation / case number
RFA(COMM)-466/2024 2025:DHC:11332-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RACHIT KATYAL
Respondent
SURESH KUMAR TANEJA & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 11.12.2025 RFA(COMM) 466/2024, CM APPL. 65537/2024 (Stay) & CM APPL. 65541/2024 (Delay of 27 days in filing appeal) RACHIT KATYAL .....Appellant Through: Mr. Bajinder Singh, Advocate. versus SURESH KUMAR TANEJA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satyam Thareja, Ms. Vasundhara Nagrath and Mr. Deepak Kumar Arya, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL) ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. 1. The present Appeal, filed under Section 96 read with Order XLI of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, challenges the Judgment and Decree dated 18.05.2024, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, West District, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi, in case being CS (Comm.) No. 302/2022, titled “Mr. Suresh Kumar Taneja & Anr. v. Mr. Rachit Katyal”. 2. The parties herein shall be referred to in the same rank as they have been arrayed in the original suit. 3. By way of the Impugned Judgment, the suit of the Plaintiffs was decreed against the Defendant while granting the following reliefs:- 4. The Defendant was inducted as tenant in the suit premises under the Lease Agreement dated 31.05.2019,