Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Bombay High Court · 2025-12-18

PUNIT VIJAY WADHWANI AND ANR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Citation / case number
WP/4986/2024
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
PUNIT VIJAY WADHWANI AND ANR
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

paucity.doc vai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION VASANT CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANANDRAO IDHOL AND ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Digitally signed by VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Date: 2025.12.24 CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & 10:22:30 +0530 SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 18TH DECEMBER, 2025. P.C. :- 1. On account of paucity of time, rest of the matters on Daily and Supplementary Board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CIS. 2. If in any of the above matters, ad-interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue till the respective next dates. If ad-interim relies is not granted for a limited period, said orders will remain unaffected. Sr.Nos. C.I.S. Date To be listed in the category (Appellate Side) 21 to 23 13.01.2026 Due - Admission (Appellate Side) 24 to 33 14.01.2026 Due - Admission (Appellate Side) 34 to 42 15.01.2026 Due - Admission (Appellate Side) 43 to 54 16.01.2026 Due - Admission 1/2 paucity.doc (Appellate Side) 55 to 60 17.01.2026 Due - Admission (Original Side) 61 17.01.2026 Final Hearing (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) 2/2

PUNIT VIJAY WADHWANI AND ANR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR · Niyam