Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-12-08

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 3589 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 3589 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 3589 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 3589 of 2025 Akhilesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus State of U.P. and 6 others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramashankar Yadav, Deepak Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Mohd. Umar Farooq for Jamil Ahamad Azmi, Akanksha Sharma (S.C.), Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. This petition, purportedly in public interest, has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to hold inquiry against respondent no.7 under the provisions of Rules 4 and 5 of the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhans, Up-Pradhans and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997 ('the Rules') and Section 95(1)(g) of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 ('the Act'). 2. An impleadment application has been filed by the Pradhan inter alia indicating that already an inquiry was instituted against the applicant wherein, after the report was given and was challenged by the applicant, now pursuant to the order dated 08.09.2025, the matter is pending before the Inquiry Committee. 3. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the allegations for w

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 3589 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam