PAWAN DUBE vs DEEPA TUTEJA & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 24.12.2025 + CM(M) 1721/2025 & CM APPL. 55882/2025 PAWAN DUBE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Tewatia, Mr. Ankush and Mr. Tarun Maan, Advocates versus DEEPA TUTEJA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vaibhav Jain, Advocate for R1 CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) 1. At the outset, learned counsel for respondent no. 1, on instructions, submits that the present petition may be allowed in the interest of expeditious disposal of the suit and also in view of legal position settled in the judgment of Pragati Construction Consultants vs Union of India & Anr., 2025 SCC OnLine Del 636. 2. Broadly speaking, it appears that the Written Statement was filed within 120 days of service of summons by the petitioner, but the Statement of Truth and the admission/denial affidavit were filed beyond 120 days of service of summons. CM(M) 1721/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, Digitally Signed KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d 15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff 801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA By:NEETU N NAIR Date: 2025.12.24 17:14:40 -08'00' Signing Date:24.12.2025 17:22:09 3. Accordingly, with consent of both sides, the impugned order is set aside and the petition is allowed, directing the learned trial court to take the Written Statement as well as Statement of Truth and admission/denial affidavit of petitioner on record and thereafter, proceed further in accordance with law. However, for delay in filing the Written Statement and Statement of Truth, the present petitio