Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-12-09

PARMAR NARAN BHAI RUPA BHAI & ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-12560/2024 2025:DHC:11128-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
PARMAR NARAN BHAI RUPA BHAI & ORS.
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 12560/2024 & CM APPL. 52230/2024 PARMAR NARAN BHAI RUPA BHAI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Mr. Satyaarth Sinha and Ms. Shradha Mewati, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, CGSC Mr. Jitendra Gautam, CRPF/RAF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA ORDER (ORAL) % 09.12.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. This writ petition is directed against order dated 9 August 2024 issued on the basis of an audit objection whereunder various amounts were directed to be recovered from the petitioners as having been overpaid to them during the year 2015-18. 2. The recovery is in the teeth of categories (i) and (iii) of para 18 of the judgment of the Supreme Court in State of Punjab v. Rafiq W.P.(C) 12560/2024 3. The only two circumstances in which the rigour of para 18 of Rafiq Masih does not apply are set out in the subsequent decisions in High Court of Punjab & Haryana v. Jagdev Singh2 and Thomas Daniel v. State of Kerala3. They are if, at the time when the excess payments were made, an undertaking was taken from the employee concerned, agreei