PANKAJ SAINI vs KL SHARMA & ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 08.12.2025 CM(M) 2376/2025, CM APPL. 77292/2025 & CM APPL. 77291/2025 PANKAJ SAINI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anurag Tiwary, Advocate versus KL SHARMA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aman Usman, Advocate for R-1 CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) 1. Petitioner/judgement debtor no. 2 has assailed order dated 27.11.2025 of the learned execution court, whereby his objection under Section 47 CPC to the execution of the money decree was dismissed with cost; and observing that despite having means to pay, the petitioner/judgement debtor no. 2 had opted to ignore the decree, warrants of arrest against him were ordered by way of the impugned order subject to the decree holder taking steps and depositing the subsistence allowance of two weeks. 2. Having heard learned counsel for petitioner/judgement debtor no. 2, I do not find it a fit case to even issue notice. Rather, the present petition is found totally frivolous and filed with the aim to protract the execution proceedings. 3. Broadly speaking, in the proceedings for execution of the money recovery decree dated 15.03.2016 (modified on 03.05.2017), the present