MANJU MEHRA & ANR. vs DEV PRATAP SEONIE (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 03.12.2025 CM(M) 2345/2025, CM APPL. 75974/2025 & CM APPL. 75975/2025 MANJU MEHRA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Pramod Ahuja, Advocate (through videoconferencing) versus DEV PRATAP SEONIE (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shakeel Sarwar Wani and Mr. Imbisaat Liyaqat, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) 1. Petitioners have assailed orders dated 25.09.2025 and 04.11.2025 of the learned trial court, whereby evidence of RW-3 was closed after part cross-examination because the witness would not appear. As regards the default on the part of RW-3 in appearing, the contention of learned counsel for petitioners is that he had an understanding with learned counsel for the present respondents that they would take adjournment on the day fixed, but subsequently learned counsel for the present respondents denied any such understanding. CM(M) 2345/2025 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4 5569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, 2. In the above backdrop, I do not find any infirmity in the impugned order. 3. Learned counsel for respond